Moral judgments about an activity’s COVID-19 risk can lead people astray
Moral judgments about an activity’s COVID-19 risk can lead people astray
- June 16, 2021
- Cailin O'Connor, LPS, Science News, June 16, 2021
Two new studies show that people consider activities that they think are immoral or
unreasonable as riskier — even when they’re not. “Our moral judgments change our factual
judgments about the world,” says philosopher of science Cailin O’Connor, [associate
professor] of the University of California, Irvine. Accounting for moral and other
biases in public health messaging is vital to combatting the spread of infectious
disease, she says.
For the full story, please visit https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-moral-judgment-activity-risk-behavior-bias.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Big business uses factual research to mislead the public - philosophers analyze the issue
- Big business uses factual research to mislead the public, Northeastern study finds
- UC Irvine's Department of Logic & Philosophy of Science earns top spots in latest faculty rankings
- LAist fact checks
- As fires ravage the LA region, so too are conspiracy theories and misinformation
connect with us: