Hydroxychloroquine and the political polarization of science
![](/files/news_events/2020/cailinandjim_880.jpg)
Hydroxychloroquine and the political polarization of science
- May 4, 2020
- Cailin O'Connor and Jim Weatherall, lps, Boston Review, May 4, 2020
UCI Associate Professor Cailin O'Connor and UCI Professor James Owen Weatherall write,
“Why are we seeing the polarization over hydroxycholorquine, then, in spite of the
serious consequences? The explanation may lie in the kind of information available
to the public about COVID-19, which differs importantly from what we see in other
cases of polarization about science.” … “All this means that there is a huge amount
of information circulating that has some scientific legitimacy but that may be dramatically
underdeveloped and more likely than normal scientific findings to be overturned.”
For the full story, please visit http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-politics/cailin-oconnor-james-owen-weatherall-hydroxychloroquine-and-political.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Bridging a gap in research on symmetry
- Big business uses factual research to mislead the public - philosophers analyze the issue
- Big business uses factual research to mislead the public, Northeastern study finds
- UC Irvine's Department of Logic & Philosophy of Science earns top spots in latest faculty rankings
- LAist fact checks
connect with us: