Why do we judge parents for putting kids at perceived − but unreal − risk?
Why do we judge parents for putting kids at perceived − but unreal − risk?
- August 22, 2016
- Research by Ashley Thomas, cognitive sciences graduate student; Barbara Sarnecka, cognitive sciences professor, and Kyle Stanford, LPS professor, is featured by NPR, Aug. 22, 2016
The paper's authors (developmental psychologists Ashley Thomas and Barbara Sarnecka, and philosopher Kyle Stanford, all of the University of California, Irvine) were kind enough to answer a few questions about their research and the politics of parenting.
For the full story, please visit http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/08/22/490847797/why-do-we-judge-parents-for-putting-kids-at-perceived-but-unreal-risk.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Computational language science post-baccalaureate program launches at UC Irvine
- UCI's Logic and Philosophy of Science Summer Diversity Program continues to champion underrepresented voices
- UCI language science at the 2023 Society for Computation in Linguistics
- Why car lines shouldn't exist
- Sorry, you've been rejected. Now let's party.
connect with us