Why do we judge parents for putting kids at perceived − but unreal − risk?
Why do we judge parents for putting kids at perceived − but unreal − risk?
- August 22, 2016
- Research by Ashley Thomas, cognitive sciences graduate student; Barbara Sarnecka, cognitive sciences professor, and Kyle Stanford, LPS professor, is featured by NPR, Aug. 22, 2016
-----
The paper's authors (developmental psychologists Ashley Thomas and Barbara Sarnecka, and philosopher Kyle Stanford, all of the University of California, Irvine) were kind enough to answer a few questions about their research and the politics of parenting.
For the full story, please visit http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/08/22/490847797/why-do-we-judge-parents-for-putting-kids-at-perceived-but-unreal-risk.
-----
Would you like to get more involved with the social sciences? Email us at communications@socsci.uci.edu to connect.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Careet RightGive your teen some freedom on their summer vacation
- Careet RightUC Irvine's Department of Logic & Philosophy of Science earns top spots in latest faculty rankings
- Careet RightComputational language science post-baccalaureate program launches at UC Irvine
- Careet RightUCI's Logic and Philosophy of Science Summer Diversity Program continues to champion underrepresented voices
- Careet RightUCI language science at the 2023 Society for Computation in Linguistics