U.S. intelligence tests crowd-sourcing against its experts

U.S. intelligence tests crowd-sourcing against its experts
- August 21, 2012
- A research study led by cognitive sciences professors Mark Steyvers, Michael Lee, and Bill Batchelder; cognitive sciences visiting researcher Youngwon Shin; and cognitive sciences visiting assistant professor Ed Merkle is featured in the Los Angeles Times August 21, 2012
From the LA Times:
Nine years ago, Congress blocked a Pentagon agency from setting up a website that
would have allowed anyone with a credit card to bet on the likelihood of foreign assassinations,
coups and terrorist attacks. The idea was to take advantage of the "wisdom of crowds,"
a social science maxim that contends the average of a group of forecasters, under
certain circumstances, tends to be more accurate than even the most knowledgeable
single forecaster... DARPA's sister agency - the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects
Activity, which funds experimental projects for the U.S. intelligence community -
is running a four-year, $50-million program that pays people willing to predict major
world events, including wars and terrorist strikes. Unlike the earlier scheme, participants
can't profit from their predictions. Now in its second year, the so-called crowd-sourcing
project involves competing corporate and university teams, including UC Irvine. Each
team includes more than a dozen social scientists and as many as 2,000 participants,
who can answer hundreds of questions each if they want.
For the full story, please visit http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cia-crowds-20120821....
To learn more about the study and/or participate, please visit http://forecastingace.com/.
Share on:
connect with us: