Pareto for the People (with Jeremy Goodman (JHU))
-----
In this study, Lederman and Goodman provide a new argument that betterness is incomplete:
there are possible situations neither of which is at least as good as the other. Unlike
more familiar arguments for this conclusion, assumptions are consistent with completeness
for individual wellbeing levels, and do not require cases involving a variable population.
A key idea is to isolate and motivate a particular sense in which betterness is impartial.
-----
connect with us: