This talk advances a cluster of distinctive thesis about what is sometimes called “the free will debate.” Among them: pluralism about the debate, or a rejection of the idea of there being a single subject matter of philosophical debates about free will; a case for non-error theoretic eliminativism about free will; the virtues of focusing on culpable agency as one regimentation of concerns about free will, and methodological caveats about how to frame the stakes; and last, consideration of a thesis Vargas calls “socio-normative insulationism,” according to which some subset of concerns oftentimes associated with free will seem relatively insulated from skeptical concerns.