Study to shed light on pro bono practices of top U.S. law firms

Study to shed light on pro bono practices of top U.S. law firms
- July 1, 2008
- Funded by National Science Foundation
Large U.S. law firms commit an average of 3-5 percent of their time each year to pro
bono work, representing causes from the death penalty and immigration to same-sex
marriage and the teaching of evolution in public schools.
Steven Boutcher, UC Irvine sociology graduate student, has received a $10,600 award
from the National Science Foundation to study how much time each of the U.S.' top
200 law firms spend on pro bono work and the influence they have on social movements
through the causes they choose to represent.
Using interviews with law firm managers and data from the American Lawyer Media, American
Bar Foundation and Indiana University Law School's Law Firm Working Group, he will
analyze time spent and pro bono cases taken on over the past ten years. He will then
determine whether patterns exist in the causes firms represent and how their work
may impact larger social movements throughout the U.S.
"A significant chunk of social change is driven by elite lawyers in large law firms,"
says Boutcher who notes that pro bono work has more than doubled across the top 200
firms since 1998. "I'm interested in learning to what extent private practice lawyers
influence and subsidize social movement activities through the cases they take on."
Firms that lead the country in pro bono work in the latest 2005 data include Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr with 99,710 hours of reported pro bono work. Coming
in second was the L.A. based Latham and Watkins at 97,882 hours. Local firm O'Melveny
and Myers was also among the top 200 with 50,584hours pro bono work.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Dickson receives grant to apply computational cognitive models to language acquisition
- Three from social sciences among 21 to be honored at annual UC Irvine Lauds and Laurel event
- Bipartisan immigration reform package? Some California lawmakers back it, but will Congress pass it?
- Immigrants in Europe and North America earn 18% less than natives - here's why
- Expert finds access to high-paying jobs - not unequal pay for the same job - is the biggest driver of immigrant wage gaps